Migrant Workers in by Michael Young
The objective of this study is to examine the conditions of migrant workers in , their roles, problems, networks, and future. It is inevitable that such a study will, in many respects, say as much about Lebanese society, particularly postwar society, as it will about the migrant workers themselves, who have flocked to in the hundreds of thousands since war's end in 1990.
While the subject is complex, the aim of the study is fairly simple: To report on a social phenomenon that has gained little attention in , and yet which is ever-present in the daily lives of the Lebanese. For one cannot avoid seeing, in even the most remote of mountain villages, migrant laborers - of which we will selectively exclude the estimated hundreds of thousands of Syrian laborers, whose status, shaped by the peculiarities of the Lebanese-Syrian relationship, falls outside the parameters which will be set in this study.
Several general statements can be made concerning migrant laborers. From a Lebanese perspective, there appear to have been two major incentives allowing the increase in the number of foreign migrants entering , whether legally or illegally, over the years: First, the ability to attract cheap foreign labor to help in the various domains of economic activity where the hiring of Lebanese was expensive, difficult, or undesirable. So, for example, a large number of Egyptians are employed in construction or in odd jobs - whether as gas station attendants, concierges in buildings, rubbish collectors, and street cleaners. Asian and African women, in contrast, provide the bulk of domestic workers, replacing Lebanese, Syrian, and Egyptian women who traditionally took on such roles.
The availability of cheap foreign labor was, and remains, a particularly profitable, if controversial, phenomenon at a time when is involved in a costly (and faltering) reconstruction effort. However, the motives for hiring migrants are not solely economic: Lebanese employers find an advantage in hiring migrants because of the ease with which they can be controlled, dismissed, and - because of their large numbers - replaced in case of dissent. One of the enduring themes of this study will be that migrant laborers in form a vulnerable group, whose rights are often ignored, in contravention to international conventions and standards.
A second motivation for hiring foreign laborers - and more specifically domestic workers, who form a substantial share of the migrant labor force - is status. One of the curious features of the postwar environment is the ease with which families, even those with limited incomes, have been able to hire domestics - from , the , , and other countries - at competitive rates. What is flagrant, however, is that this impulse has often seemed less necessary than advantageous socially, in a society in which social status during the war years was severely shaken up. Put bluntly: low-cost migrants are often instruments for the social enhancement of many Lebanese who could not, in different circumstances, enjoy the luxury of domestic help.
This has, at times, come at an odious price: the aspiration for status, and the rigid hierarchical relationships that have ensued, have created a misguided sense of possession, where migrants have, at times, been treated as little better than property. This has put in an unfortunate spotlight as a country facilitating, or at least ignoring, the worst aspects of what is familiarly known as "the new slavery". As with more classical slavery, certain elements of racism have also been evident in relationships between Lebanese and migrant laborers, particularly those arriving from
The relationship between migrant laborers and their Lebanese employers has been adversely affected by those very impulses driving migrants to . Amplifying the ambient disdain and frequent denial of basic human rights to migrants has been the fact that migrant laborers come to with marked disadvantages: Virtually all are poor and in need of work, which has augmented their dependency on employers. Where there has been dependency, power relationships have naturally spawned, but with a critical addition: These have not always been restrained by rules and regulations preventing abuse, though things are gradually changing for the better in .
Moreover, this relationship of dependency has, at various times, been explicitly or implicitly reinforced by the behavior of the Lebanese administrative, security and, at times, judicial authorities. Evenhandedness before the law and due process still are exceptions for many migrant laborers. This general tendency has, in turn, encouraged mistreatment, whether on the part of agencies importing migrant laborers or employers indifferent to the work conditions and well-being of their migrant employees.
Read the rest: http://www.lnf.org.lb/migrationnetwork/mig1.html